Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components

Components to be used in examples

Information

Extends from Modelica.Icons.Package (Icon for standard packages).

Package Content

Name Description
Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.SimpleSolenoid SimpleSolenoid Simple network model of a lifting magnet with planar armature end face
Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.AdvancedSolenoid AdvancedSolenoid Advanced network model of a lifting magnet with planar armature end face, split magnetomotive force

Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.SimpleSolenoid Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.SimpleSolenoid

Simple network model of a lifting magnet with planar armature end face

Information

Please refer to the Parameters section for a schematic drawing of this axis-symmetric lifting magnet. In the half-section below, the flux tube elements of the actuator's magnetic circuit are superimposed on a field plot obtained with FEA. The magnetomotive force imposed by the coil is modelled as one lumped element. As a result, the radial leakage flux between armature and yoke that occurs especially at large working air gaps can not be considered properly. This leads to a a higher total reluctance and lower inductance respectively compared to FEA for large working air gaps (i.e., armature close to x_max). Please have a look at the comments associated with the individual model components for a short explanation of their purpose in the model.

Field lines and assigned flux tubes of the simple solenoid model

The coupling coefficient c_coupl in the coil is set to 1 in this example, since leakage flux is accounted for explicitly with the flux tube element G_mLeakWork. Although this leakage model is rather simple, it describes the reluctance force due to the leakage field sufficiently, especially at large air gaps. With decreasing air gap length, the influence of the leakage flux on the actuator's net reluctance force decreases due to the increasing influence of the main working air gap G_mAirWork.

During model-based actuator design, the radii and lengths of the flux tube elements (and hence their cross-sectional areas and flux densities) should be assigned with parametric equations so that common design rules are met (e.g., allowed flux density in ferromagnetic parts, allowed current density and required cross-sectional area of winding). For simplicity, those equations are omitted in the example. Instead, the found values are assigned to the model elements directly.

Parameters

NameDescription
RArmature coil resistance [Ohm]
NNumber of turns
r_yokeOutOuter yoke radius [m]
r_yokeInInner yoke radius [m]
l_yokeAxial yoke length [m]
t_yokeBotAxial thickness of yoke bottom [m]
l_poleAxial length of pole [m]
t_poleBotAxial thickness of bottom at pole side [m]
t_airParRadial thickness of parasitic air gap due to slide guiding [m]
Material
materialFerromagnetic material characteristics
Armature and stopper
r_armArmature radius = pole radius [m]
l_armArmature length [m]
cSpring stiffness between impact partners [N/m]
dDamping coefficient between impact partners [N.s/m]
x_minStopper at minimum armature position [m]
x_maxStopper at maximum armature position [m]

Connectors

NameDescription
pElectrical connector
nElectrical connector
flangeFlange of component

Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.AdvancedSolenoid Modelica.Magnetic.FluxTubes.Examples.SolenoidActuator.Components.AdvancedSolenoid

Advanced network model of a lifting magnet with planar armature end face, split magnetomotive force

Information

Please have a look at SimpleSolenoid for a general description of this actuator. Unlike in that simple magnetic network model, the coil is split into two lumped elements here. This enables for more realistic modelling of the radial leakage flux between armature and yoke (leakage permeance G_mLeakRad). Especially for large air gaps, the influence of this leakage flux on the actuator's inductance and its electromagnetic force is rather strong. Please have a look at ComparisonQuasiStatic for a comparison of both models with FEA-based results included as reference.

Assigned flux tubes and field plot of the solenoid actuator

The parasitic capacitances c_par1 and c_par2 across both partial coils assure that the voltages across these coils are well-defined during simulation.

Parameters

NameDescription
NNumber of turns
RCoil resistance [Ohm]
R_parResistance parallel to the coil, in series to C_par [Ohm]
C_parCapacitance parallel to the coil, in series to R_par [F]
r_yokeOutOuter yoke radius [m]
r_yokeInInner yoke radius [m]
l_yokeAxial yoke length [m]
t_yokeBotAxial thickness of yoke bottom [m]
l_poleAxial length of pole [m]
t_poleBotAxial thickness of bottom at pole side [m]
t_airParRadial thickness of parasitic air gap due to slide guiding [m]
Material
materialFerromagnetic material characteristics
Armature and stopper
r_armArmature radius = pole radius [m]
l_armArmature length [m]
cSpring stiffness between impact partners [N/m]
dDamping coefficient between impact partners [N.s/m]
x_minStopper at minimum armature position [m]
x_maxStopper at maximum armature position [m]

Connectors

NameDescription
pElectrical connector
nElectrical connector
flangeFlange of component
Automatically generated Thu Oct 1 16:07:48 2020.